Agrarian reform and cooperativism
Posted on May 25th, 2009THE Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) has been with us for 36 years since Presidential Decree No. 27 ordering land reform was issued.
We have spent P200 billion for the program but there is not much to show for its success. Worse, CARP has been blamed for the widespread poverty in the countryside because it broke the link and brought enmity between landowners and tenants.
It is also being blamed for the rice shortage because many areas were converted to other uses by landowners to avoid coverage.
Now, a new bill has been filed in Congress to extend the land reform program for five more years. The law is expected to be approved during the current session, which will end in the middle of June 2009. It is supported by Catholic bishops and by some activists currently demonstrating in Manila.
Now that we are renewing CARP, we should realize that it is not enough to just pass the law. There should be complete support, financial or otherwise, to guarantee its successful implementation.
The World Unseen movie download Perhaps, it might also be fair to review the pricing of the lands still to be disposed and adjust this to present economic conditions.
Also, as it is now, considering that the bulk of the eligible lands have been disposed, we can reduce the personnel complement of DAR to adjust to a lesser workload, and for them to find placements in some other areas where they are needed.
We were reading a book lately about cooperative principles and practices, and we think land reform implemented through cooperatives might be more successful.
While it is true that the seed of the cooperative movement has been planted in the Philippines as early as Rizal’s time (when he formed farmers in Dapitan into a society following concepts of coops he picked up in Europe), the movement as a formal vehicle by which people may improve their welfare was introduced in the beginning of the American regime.
Much later, when we became independent, cooperatives of various types were introduced from the 1950s through the 1960s, with rural cooperatives being the major focus, especially with the passage of the Land Reform Code in 1963.
The period from 1972 to 1986, however, may be seen as a time when the basic principle of cooperativism and voluntary membership was massively and wantonly violated. In fact, membership in cooperatives among farmers was made compulsory, with non-members penalized by being banned from credit, services and other incentives of various government production programs. This happened during the Marcos regime when we registered a dramatic increase in the number of cooperatives called the Samahang Nayon found in almost all places in the country.
Now, they are all gone.
While there are fewer cooperatives today, we believe that, properly managed, they can carrying out a very successful land reform program.
Thank you for reading this post. You can now Read Comment (1) or Leave A Trackback.
One Response to “Agrarian reform and cooperativism”
Leave a Reply
Note: Any comments are permitted only because the site owner is letting you post, and any comments will be removed for any reason at the absolute discretion of the site owner.You can follow any responses to this entry through the Comments Feed. You can Leave A Comment, or A Trackback.
Previous Post: Meat production »
Next Post: Villar enters critical stage of quest for presidency »







May 26th, 2009 11:58
Pacquiao for Congress!
yes! i boldly endorse manny pacquiao for congress! but before i get the flak from millions of fans for doing this, please read on. manny pacquiao has recently registered a local political party. he may run for congress or mayor in sarangani province. he may help the administration by endorsing its candidates. that way, the politicos who are riding on his popularity will be happy because manny will carry them should they run for national positions. for love of country, and in order to make those politicos pay back for the free endorsements of manny, i suggest that pacquiao run for congress by fielding himself and two others, using his local party as a partylist for, say athletes or sportsmen. that way, he will not spend much, he will represent that sector, travel nationwide to let his politico friends carry his partylist in their ballots. that way, pacquiao can speak his own language — sports. i bet he will win by a landslide. nobody will use pacquiao that way. he may run with paeng nepomuceno (bowling) and efren “bata” reyes. or alvin patrimonio, jaworski, etc. that way, they will work to overhaul the system of the sporting world. well, anything goes from there. i hope this reaches manny. you know…. manny pacquiao for congress!!!